If you’ve done any searching on the internet, you’ve probably seen the advice to minimize your financial planning and retirement fees as much as possible. Many outlets for financial explanations and information recommend paying as little as possible to maintain your accounts. In general, many sources recommend a passive, uninvolved investment strategy that minimizes all costs for account management and financial planning.[1]
This isn’t bad advice, but it is incomplete. The obvious logic here is that the less you spend the more you keep, and that extra you hang on to can compound for decades to increase your wealth. Morningstar, a fund rating company, has written about the link between fees and performance for years. Cheap funds, or at least cheap relative to their peers, frequently outperform their peers (go figure)! Vanguard has built an entire business around dirt cheap passive funds. Investment performance matters, but financial advice is much broader than that.
Staying tax efficient, for example, has nothing to do with how much your IRA returns. Nor does determining the optimal age at which to retire or to start drawing from Social Security. Your fee and total performance also say very little about the mistakes you may have avoided along the way by seeking out qualified counsel, and they certainly can’t speak to the time you get back in your day when leaning on an expert for help.
Quantifying the precise value of a good financial planner is hard. Different investors require different sets of services, and different advisors charge different levels of fees. Nevertheless, Vanguard took a crack it when they published Putting a value on your value: quantifying Vanguard Advisor’s Alpha®. They identify seven core services that nearly all financial advisors offer and attempted to quantify the value of each one of them. They range from things like cost-effective implementation and rebalancing to behavioral coaching and spending strategies. The analysis suggests that a good financial advisor may be able to add 3% or more each year in value, though this number is a moving target. For some investors and advisors the quantifiable value added may be far less.
As a personal aside from this author, I have long believed that the most valuable commodity is time, and that you are buying a lot of it when you choose to work with an advisor. Yes, you’ll also benefit from the perfunctory portfolio and planning things that advisors *theoretically* know how to do better than you. But you’ll also get more time back in your day to focus on the things that excite you and genuinely matter in your life. You can stop trying to be an investment whiz. No more online calculators with contradictory results, unexpected processing errors and hiccups with brokerage houses, and the unanticipated stress that comes with wondering if you’re actually doing it all correctly. Use your time to take your kids and grandkids out to dinner instead.
This isn’t the kind of thing that tallies up neatly in an “is it worth it” type of analysis, and it certainly goes beyond the scope of the Vanguard paper. Great financial advice is as qualitative as it is quantitative, and what you determine its worth to be is subjective and personal to you. If you are curious about what an advisor can do for you personally and whether it’s worth the cost, then reach out and give us a call. We can set a complimentary consultation to allow you to get a sense of the kind of client-focused work a financial advisor can do, and you can decide for yourself if you think a financial advisor is worth it.
[1] https://www.investopedia.com/articles/personal-finance/071415/how-cut-financial-advisor-expenses.asp